
Who we are
Steven Meurrens is a Partner at Larlee Rosenberg, a highly regarded law firm in Vancouver, British Columbia that practices exclusively in Canadian immigration law.
Practice Areas
Our firm practices almost exclusively in Canadian immigration matters, including work permit applications, provincial nominations, skilled worker applications, and more.

Immigration Blog
Bank Statements
In recent years, bank statements have become an increasingly common, and often decisive, requirement in applications submitted to Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (“IRCC”), including visitor visas, work permits, and study permits. While proof of funds has always been part of the framework, officers are now placing greater emphasis on detailed financial documentation rather than relying solely on summary letters or declarations. For visitor visa applications, bank statements are frequently used to assess whether an applicant has the financial means to support their stay in Canada without working. Officers are also using them to evaluate broader credibility factors, such as whether an applicant’s financial profile aligns with their stated travel plans. A sudden influx of funds or inconsistencies between income and savings can raise concerns about the genuineness of the application. In the work permit context, particularly for owner-operator or entrepreneurial applications, bank statements are increasingly used to assess whether a business is viable and whether the applicant can realistically sustain operations and meet payroll obligations. Even in employer-specific work permits, financial documentation may be requested to confirm that wages can be paid and that the underlying job offer is credible. For study permits, bank statements now play a central ...
The Return of Incomplete Applications
I have previously written in this blog about how Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada ("IRCC') has adapted an exceptionally strict approach to returning applications for incompleteness. I have also written in Policy Options about how frustrating this approach can be, because one of its main purposes appears to be to allow politicians to boast about reduced processing times, while ignoring the fact that the experience of individuals who are actually applying is actually often longer than previously. I wrote: The current rigid triage system distorts a fair comparison of processing times. Suppose an individual applies to sponsor a spouse to immigrate to Canada and forgets to include in one of the forms the city where a non-accompanying brother was born. Previously, processing might have been delayed by two to three months while IRCC contacted the family, informed them of the mistake and requested they provide the information. Now, IRCC would instead return the application one to two months after it is submitted, and the family would have to resubmit. If some supporting documents have expired, they may have to reobtain them, and the process can easily take several months. Under the previous system, this delay would have added two to ...
When the Court Will Award Costs
In this post, which will be updated frequently, I will be looking at scenarios where the Federal Court ordered costs. I'm hoping that this post can become a useful reference for Federal Court practitioners.


