Last Updated on October 27, 2010 by Steven Meurrens
Does the Immigration Appeal Division have an obligation to determine the genuineness of a marriage on a de novo appeal from a removal order on the basis of a misrepresentation, when the genuineness of the marriage was the misrepresentation alleged in the subsection 44(1) report and was relevant to a determination by the IAD of whether the person concerned made the misrepresentation in issue before it?
This was the question before the Federal Court of Appeal in Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) v. Peirovdinnabi, 2010 FCA 267. In answering it, the Court reflected on the nature of a de novo hearing.
The matter pertained to an individual whose application for permanent residence on humanitarian and compassionate grounds was granted, in part because of the applicant’s marriage at the time. The application was approved despite the fact that the applicant’s ex-spouse approached immigration authorities advising them that the marriage was a sham entered into solely for immigration purposes.
Shortly thereafter, the applicant applied to sponsor a spouse. This got the attention of immigration authorities, who made a s. 44(1) report to the effect that the applicant was inadmissible for having made a misrepresentation in his H&C application, and that the marriage was not genuine.
The Immigration Division found that the applicant failed to disclose key facts in his H&C application, and that he was therefore inadmissible. Having done so, the Immigration Division stated that it was not necessary to determine the genuineness of the marriage issue.
The Immigration Appeal Division overturned the Immigration Division’s finding that the applicant had failed to disclose key facts. It also stated that it would not consider the genuineness of the marriage because the Immigration Division had not found it necessary to so.Read more ›
There are currently thousands of young adults each year who come to Canada through an International Experience Canada exchange. Those coming under the Working Holiday program receive open work permits, while those coming under the International Co-Op and the Young Professionals programs receive employer-specific work permits.Read more ›
Manitoba is located in the prairies. Its population is the fifth largest in Canada, at 1,232,654. It’s capital city is Winnipeg, where 60% of Manitoba’s population live, and is where four of the province’s five universities are located. It also has Canada’s most successful provincial nominee program.Read more ›
The dragon is sputtering. According to figures released by Citizenship and Immigration Canada, more immigrants will arrive from both the Philippines and India than from China in 2010.Read more ›
The Citizenship Test has been expanded to include questions on architecture and volunteerism.Read more ›
Examining the “working abroad for a Canadian business” exception to the “two years out of five” rule for maintaining permanent residency status.Read more ›
The government has introduced regulatory changes, which take effect immediately, for determining whether a marriage is a “bad faith” marriage or a “marriage of convenience”.Read more ›