Last Updated on March 31, 2020 by Steven Meurrens

A quick post today as there is alot going on due to the corona virus, but Justice Annis just released an interesting decision in Pryce v. Canada where he certified the following question:

In the context of a request for humanitarian and compassionate considerations under subsection 25 (1) of IRPA, must an officer consider evidence of past hardship of unconscionable mistreatment of an applicant and her children, not recurring or arising on removal, and not cited as a factor in the Guidelines, but that may accord with the principles in Chirwa v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) (1970), 4 I.A.C. 338 adopted in Kanthasamy v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) 2015 SCC 61, even if the issue has not been explicitly raised by the applicant as a relevant factor for consideration? If not, may the applications judge raise the question as a new issue in accordance with the principles of R. v Mian, 2014 SCC 54?