One of the defining features of the Canadian justice system is the open court principle. Court proceedings are presumed to be open to the public, reflecting the principle that justice should not only be done, but should be seen to be done. As the Federal Court recently noted, courts “do their business in public.” That presumption, however, is not absolute. In limited circumstances, the Federal Court will order that a party’s identity be anonymized. The Starting Point: The Open Court Principle The Supreme Court of Canada reaffirmed in Sherman Estate v. Donovan, 2021 SCC 25, that openness is the default position in Canadian courts. Anyone seeking to restrict public access to court proceedings bears a significant burden. To obtain an anonymity order (or another order limiting public access), an applicant must establish three things: Court openness poses a serious risk to an important public interest; The order is necessary because no reasonable alternative would adequately protect that interest; and The benefits of the order outweigh its negative effects on the open court principle. This is a demanding test. Mere embarrassment or inconvenience will not suffice. What Qualifies as an “Important Public Interest”? The Supreme Court identified several interests that may … Read More
Staying Removal at Federal Court
The Federal Court of Canada can provide interlocutory stays, including staying removal. There is a three-stage test to be applied when considering an application for an interlocutory injunction. A court must determine that there is a serious issue or question to be tried, that the applicant would suffer irreparable harm if the injunction were to be refused, and that the balance of convenience (assessed by examining which of the parties will suffer the greater harm from granting or refusing the injunction) rests with the applicant. As well, it is important to note that a stay of removal is an equitable remedy that is typically only available to an individual who has not committed an inequity. Overall Guidance In Slepcsik v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2026 FCA 137, the Federal Court of Appeal wrote: [1] For the vast and overwhelming majority of those who are returned to their country of citizenship, removal from Canada is immensely stressful, anxiety-provoking, deeply sad, and heartbreaking. One loses their job or abandons their studies, and all health and social benefits cease. It involves enforced separation from loved ones and friends, along with being torn from the stability and comfort one may have known while in Canada. To think otherwise would … Read More
Ineligibility to Make a Refugee Claim
Section 101(d) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act states: 101. (1) A claim is ineligible to be referred to the Refugee Protection Division if (a) refugee protection has been conferred on the claimant under this Act; (b) a claim for refugee protection by the claimant has been rejected by the Board; (b.1) the claimant entered Canada after June 24, 2020 and made the claim more than one year after the day of their entry; (b.2) the claimant entered Canada at a location along the Canada–United States land border — including the waters along or across that border — that is not a port of entry and made the claim after the end of the time limit referred to in subsection 159.4(1.1) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations; (c) a prior claim by the claimant was determined to be ineligible to be referred to the Refugee Protection Division, or to have been withdrawn or abandoned; (c.1) the claimant has, before making a claim for refugee protection in Canada, made a claim for refugee protection to a country other than Canada, and the fact of its having been made has been confirmed in accordance with an agreement or arrangement entered into by … Read More
Language Requirements and Work Permits
Regulation 200(3)(a) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations, SOR/2002-227 provides that an officer shall not issue a work permit to a foreign national if there are reasonable grounds to believe that the foreign national is unable to perform the work sought. An issue that is becomming increasingly common is whether someone has sufficient language ability to perform the work sought. IELTS For the most part, the Federal Court has been very deferential to visa officers when assessing whether they have the language requirements to perform the work sought. In Sen v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 777, for example, Madam Justice Strickland determined that it was reasonable for a visa officer to determine that someone with a 3.5 IELTS reading score could not perform the duties of a Cook in Canada because they might be unable to follow recipes, read notes from serving staff, and read food safety instructions. In Singh v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 170 , Madam Justice McDonald ruled that it was reasonable for a visa officer to determine that an individual with IELTS 5.0 in reading would be unable to safely read road signs, understand safety procedures and regulations, record cargo information and administer bills. … Read More
Canada’s Interpretation of Article 1F(b) of the 1951 Refugee Convention
Article 1F(b) of the Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees, Can. T.S. 1969 No. 6 (the “1951 Refugee Convention“) states that the provisions of this 1951 Refugee Convention shall not apply to any person with respect to whom there are serious reasons for considering that they have committed a serious non-political crime outside the country of refuge prior to his admission to that country as a refugee. Section 98 of Canada’s Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (“IRPA” or the “Act“) incorporates Article 1F(b) of the 1951 Refugee Convention into Canadian immigration law. What is the Purpose of Article 1F(b)? Does Is it Restricted to Fugitives? If a Person is Rehabilitated Can They Still be Excluded from Refugee Protection? In Febles v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration Canada), 2014 SCC 68 (“Febles“), the Supreme Court of Canada (the “Supreme Court“) addressed the issue of whether the application of Article 1F(b) of the 1951 Refugee Convention is simply a matter of looking at the seriousness of a crime when it was committed, or whether it requires consideration of other matters, including, for example, whether a refugee claimant is a fugitive and/or whether an individual is rehabilitated. The Supreme Court found that the purpose of Article 1F(b) … Read More
Work Permits for Vulnerable Workers
Section 207.1 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations (the “IRPR”) states that (modified for ease of reading): 207.1 (1) A work permit may be issued under section 200 to a foreign national in Canada if there are reasonable grounds to believe that the foreign national is experiencing or is at risk of experiencing abuse in the context of their employment in Canada and if they (a) hold a work permit; or (b) previously held a work permit, have applied for a renewal of that permit and are authorized to work in Canada under implied status. Family member of vulnerable worker (2) A work permit may be issued to a foreign national in Canada who is a family member of a person described in paragraph (1)(a) or (b). In other words, temporary foreign workers in Canada who are experiencing, or have experienced abuse, can apply for open work permits. People who have engaged in unauthorized work or have not complied with employment conditions are not excluded from the program. The objectives of IRPR r. 207.1 are to: provide migrant workers who are experiencing abuse, or who are at risk of abuse, with a distinct means to leave their employer; mitigate the … Read More
Restoration of Status
If a visitor, worker, or student loses their legal status in Canada, they may be eligible to apply for status restoration. This process, known as a restoration application, allows individuals to regain their temporary resident status under specific conditions. According to section 182 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations (“IRPR”), applicants must meet certain eligibility criteria to restore their status in Canada.: 182. On application made by a visitor, worker or student within 90 days after losing temporary resident status as a result of failing to comply with a condition imposed under paragraph 185(a), any of subparagraphs 185(b)(i) to (iii) or paragraph 185(c), an officer shall restore that status if, following an examination, it is established that the visitor, worker or student meets the initial requirements for their stay, has not failed to comply with any other conditions imposed and is not the subject of a declaration made under subsection 22.1(1) of the Act. According to Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (“IRCC“) Guidelines, if an individual applies to extend their temporary resident status and IRCC refuses the application after their status has expired, the Case Processing Centre – Edmonton will notify them that they can submit a restoration of … Read More
Rehabilitation Applications
Section 36(3)(c) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act provides the legislative basis for rehablitation applications. It states that: 36(3)(c) the matters referred to in paragraphs (1)(b) and (c) and (2)(b) and (c) do not constitute inadmissibility in respect of a permanent resident or foreign national who, after the prescribed period, satisfies the Minister that they have been rehabilitated or who is a member of a prescribed class that is deemed to have been rehabilitated. IRCC Rehabilitation Guide The following PDF is IRCC’s United States Criminality Assessment Guide. As well, here is an internal IRCC New York memo which provides context on the number of rehabilitation applications that they receive. Where To Submit IRCC’s preference is that rehabilitation applications be submitted separate from permanent or temporary residence applications. Statistics Jurisprudence In Hadad v. Canada (The Minister of Citizenship, Immigration, and Multiculturalism), 2011 FC 1503, the Federal Court affirmed several important principles of rehabilitation applications, including that: The Minister should take into consideration the unique facts of each particular case and consider whether the overall situation warrants a finding that the individual has been rehabilitated; rehabilitation is forward looking; and an officer commits a reviewable error if they too much importance to … Read More
Inadmissible for Crimes Against Humanity
Section 35 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (the “IRPA“) provides that: Human or international rights violations 35 (1) A permanent resident or a foreign national is inadmissible on grounds of violating human or international rights for (a) committing an act outside Canada that constitutes an offence referred to in sections 4 to 7 of the Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes Act; (b) being a prescribed senior official in the service of a government that, in the opinion of the Minister, engages or has engaged in terrorism, systematic or gross human rights violations, or genocide, a war crime or a crime against humanity within the meaning of subsections 6(3) to (5) of the Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes Act; or (c) being a person, other than a permanent resident, whose entry into or stay in Canada is restricted pursuant to a decision, resolution or measure of an international organization of states or association of states, of which Canada is a member, that imposes sanctions on a country against which Canada has imposed or has agreed to impose sanctions in concert with that organization or association. Internal Guideline Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (“IRCC“) has produced a useful internal document … Read More
Agriculture LMIAs
The Department of Employment and Social Development’s (“ESDC“) Primary Agricultural Stream allows employers to hire temporary foreign workers (“TFWs“) for a maximum period of 24 months when Canadians and permanent residents are not available. The program was created to reduce differences between the Seasonal Agricultural Workers Program (“SAWP“) and the regular Labour Market Impact Assessment (“LMIA“) stream. Overview of LMIAs Under the Temporary Foreign Worker Program ESDC reviews LMIA applications to assess the likely impact that foreign workers will have on the Canadian labour market. Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada then generally processes work permit applicaitons submitted by foreign nationals who want to work in Canada. IRCC ensures that program requirements are met, and assesses the admissibility of applicants. The Canada Border Services Agency (“CBSA”) examines foreign nationals at the time of entry and determines whether they may enter Canada. Agricultural LMIAs The Primary Agricultural Stream applies to TFWs entering Canada from any country. Information can be found on the ESDC website here: http://www.esdc.gc.ca/en/foreign_workers/hire/agricultural/overview.page In brief, Primary Agriculture is defined as work duties that must: be performed within the boundaries of a farm, nursery or greenhouse involve at least one activity, such as: operation of agricultural machinery, boarding, care, breeding, sanitation or … Read More